| | The following is a list of the major changes to Natural Healing
December 11, 2007 Happy Holidays every one This year we can get our continuing education requirement and Natural Healing Seminar the Same Weekend. We will start the Natural Healing Sunday 13 thru Tuesday 15th. So strap on your Rocket Boosters and let’s get ready to Blow Away the competition in 2008. I look forward to seeing you all in Vegas!! September 10, 2007The new Natural Healing Set for 2008 is ready. The Advanced seminar is a great addition to Natural Healing, not only do you gain insights on finding and bringing out the core problems, you also get the new toys as we develop them. With your advanced insights you are in the unique position to see what is happening and possible problems that need to be dealt with all the while becoming one of the best Natural Healers in the world. Our 2008 vile set has all the tools that were developed and ready for the general practitioner to use without fear of problems. If you are an advanced practitioner you will receive the new tools to work with before the new sets are ready. So now we are working on the 2009 tools and will do so till next year about this time. If you were disappointed after going to a seminar and a few months later the new set came out you can cool your frustrations by becoming an advanced practitioner. The New set makes the New practitioner jump light years ahead so that they can easily become a Premier practitioner in a very short time. You will be able to take on difficult cases and make changes they would normally take weeks, months, years and even that which they say can’t be done. Does it work on anything and everything? I didn’t say you would become the Master of the Universe, but you will begin to develop your abilities to understand and determine the principles that get a person where they are and in so doing discover how you can move them where they want to go at a pace they can handle. You will Marvel at the things you can do even on your first encounter with patients and so will your patients. First thing that happens is you begin to work with and gain understanding of what the programs are doing. Wonder is a wonderful thing because it drives you to discovery. As you work with patients and the programs, you will begin to see dynamic patterns and so be able to adapt to what each patient needs and find the tools that can do it. Familiarity with the tools brings your artistic abilities to a height that rivals the Masters without having to be a savant or genius. Aren’t you glad you don’t have to be a genius to Master Natural Healing? We have taken the Difficult and Simplified it so you too can Master your abilities. October 30, 2006- A introduction to Natural Healing will be presented at the Karl Parker Seminar January 25-28, 2006. You can register for Karl Parkers seminar at www.karlparkerseminars.com (Log on to see how to get the seminar for free)
- Come and see what all the talk is about and the many different techniques that are out there to learn. This is one of the best seminars to attend, Karl is talking about over a 100 speakers teaching everything from office Policies to techniques, and everything in-between.
Come and join us in January.
October 17, 2006 Nano Dust UpdateThe NHS 2007 version will deactivate the Nanites and let them leave the body without infecting anyone else, but the TBM and the old NHS versions only removes the Nanites from the body allowing them to infect the next person that walks by. It is the power of Chaos that deactivates the Nanites. Test: Natural Healing Technique Vial 2007 on chest Fix: Stabilization Test: Then say" Nano-Dust" Fix: Stabilization Test High Thymus (will Be Weak) If not weak then redo the last part and make sure the points are correct and then it will go weak. Remove all vials and hands Test High Thymus Fix: Stabilization End of visit For TBM only It does not do as much as NHS but it will help. Test: Biological ___, Biological 2 ____ on the chest Say Nano-Dust Fix: Stabilization Remove all vials and hands Test High Thymus Fix: Stabilization End of visit NanotechnologyNanomaterials could also have adverse environmental impacts. Proper regulation should be in place to minimize any harmful effects. Because nanomaterials are invisible to the human eye, extra caution must be taken to avoid releasing these particles into the environment. Some preliminary studies point to possible carcinogenic (cancer-causing) properties of carbon nanotubes. Although these studies need to be confirmed, many scientists consider it prudent now to take measures to prevent any potential hazard that these nanostructures may pose. However, the vast majority of nanotechnology-based products will contain nanomaterials bound together with other materials or components, rather than free-floating Nano-sized objects, and will therefore not pose such a risk.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
NanoBio InterfacesAt the Center for Nanoscale Materials, research into biological-inorganic interfaces focuses on the design, synthesis, and characterization of novel amalgams that fuse biological and inorganic materials. The integration of “soft” biological and organic molecular assemblies with “hard” inorganic nano-architectures is of special interest because of the opportunity to combine normally disparate chemical and physical properties within a single system. This research will lead to the creation of entirely new classes of materials with tailored functionalities unattainable with individual components. For example, the robustness and catalytic and electronic reactivities of nanoscale inorganic materials can be combined with the responsiveness and molecular selectivity of biological molecules. Such nanostructured bio-inorganic amalgams can be applied in a broad range of areas, including Chemical catalysis, Sensors, Information storage, Computing, Artificial vision, Biological intervention, and Environmental sensing and remediation. Key activities include Bio-inorganic composites Nanostructured carbon-based materials and diamond nanoelectromechanical systems Biosensors and devices Manipulation of biomolecules by using nanoparticles Complex fluids and membranes Nanocatalysis Chemical assembly – directed/templated self-assembly Nanoparticle synthesis of metals, semiconductors, and insulators Nanomaterials for energy X-ray, electron, neutron and photonic characterization Theory and modeling 
Specific targets include: Catalysts that combine the reactivity of nanostructured inorganics with the selectivity and complexity of biological molecules Hybrid nanocomposites that integrate biology with electronics Functional nanostructured materials that facilitate biological energy storage and transduction Actuators, transducers, and power sources that serve as active elements for supramolecular machines http://nano.anl.gov/research/nano_bio.html We have been treating this for months it is called Nano-Dust and it appears that some of the Nano-dust got released in Japan and is causing breathing problems, Stomach Digestion, Sore throat, and other problems as well. You may have to run this several time on a patient in different visits, because we are still finding new Nanites built on different material. So far we are up to 28 elements that the Nanites are made from and still checking. The Elements we have found so far are C(6), Ti(22), Fe (26), Co(27), Rb(37), Sr(38), ZR(40), Rh(45), I(53), Cs(55), La(57), Pr(59), Eu(63), Ho(67), Tm(69), Lu(71), TI(81), Bi(83), Rn(86), Th(90), U(92), Am(95), Es(99), Md(101), LR(103), Ku(104), Ha(105), Sg (106), so far this is what we have written down.
September 15, 2006July 4, 2006New Test Kit 2007- This new set is so powerful and needed now,, not in January that we just could not wait. For those of you who are upset it did not come out earlier sorry but we just got it finished and we have been working on another technique for over 2 years and out of this has come the Chaos technique that has changed the entire concept of how things work This new concept works on a random organized overload appearance, but it is working the way it is designed. If it can not fix it in the front door then it will come in though many other doors at the same time.
Chaos TheoryChaos theory describing the complex and unpredictable motion or dynamics of systems that are sensitive to their initial conditions. Chaotic systems are mathematically deterministic—that is, they follow precise laws, but their irregular behavior can appear to be random to the casual observer. Chaotic behavior is common in systems as varied as electric circuits, measles outbreaks, lasers, clashing gears, heart rhythms, electrical brain activity, circadian rhythms, fluids, animal populations, and chemical reactions. It is suspected that even economic systems, such as the stock exchange, may be chaotic. The field of chaos is evolving rapidly from a theoretical to an applied science. The dynamic nature of the universe has led to a great deal of scientific research dedicated to analyzing change. Until recently, it was believed that if the dynamics of a system behaved unpredictably, it was due to random external influences. Therefore, scientists concluded that if random influences could be eliminated, then the behavior of all such deterministic systems could be predicted indefinitely. It is now known that many systems can exhibit long-term unpredictability even in the absence of random influences. Such systems are called chaotic. Even very simple systems, such as a pendulum, exhibit chaos. The unpredictability of chaotic systems arises due to their sensitivity to their initial conditions, such as their initial position and velocity. Two identical chaotic systems set in motion with slightly different initial conditions can quickly exhibit motions that are quite different. French mathematician Henri Poincaré concluded that he could not prove the solar system to be completely predictable. He was the first to state the defining feature of what later became known as chaos: “It may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomena. A small error in the former will produce an enormous error in the latter. Prediction becomes impossible. ...” The ramifications of Poincaré's discovery were not fully appreciated by most scientists until computers allowed them to easily model and visualize chaotic systems. Before then, however, pioneering scientists and engineers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration used Poincaré's work to send people and satellites into orbit. Edward Lorenz, an American meteorologist, discovered in the early 1960s that a simplified computer model of the weather demonstrated extreme sensitivity to the initial measured state of the weather (see Meteorology). He demonstrated visually that there was structure in his chaotic weather model that, when plotted in three dimensions, fell onto a butterfly-shaped fractal set of points of a type now known as a strange attractor. Lorenz rediscovered chaos and proved that long-range forecasting of the weather was impossible. By the early 1980s, experiments regularly showed that many physical and biological systems behave chaotically. One of the first such systems to be discovered was the dripping water faucet. Under certain conditions, the timing between water drops from a leaking faucet demonstrates chaotic behavior, making the long-term prediction of the timing of drops impossible. According to recent evidence, Poincaré's observations concerning the unpredictability of the solar system appear to be correct. Observations and computer simulations of the irregular tumbling motion of Hyperion, a potato-shaped moon of Saturn, have provided the first conclusive proof that objects in the solar system can behave chaotically. Recent computer simulations have also shown that the orbit of Pluto, the outermost planet of the solar system, is chaotic. Scientists are currently developing applications that use chaos. New chaos-aware control techniques are being used to stabilize lasers, manipulate chemical reactions, encode information, and change chaotic heart rhythms into healthy, regular heart rhythms. Looking at the WholeScientists have traditionally found it extremely fruitful to focus on the nitty-gritty, reducing phenomena to fundamental component elements. Physicists have probed deeper and deeper into the structure of matter. Biologists have sought to understand the basic molecular building blocks of living things. In search of new insights, complexity theory wants to turn that approach on its head. Instead of following in the steps of particle physics or molecular biology and looking at increasingly minute levels of a system in order to find out what makes it tick, complexity theorists seek to understand systems as a whole. The key to comprehending how a system works, proponents of complexity theory maintain, lies not so much in understanding the parts in themselves as in understanding their interactions with one another, for the parts working together may exhibit new phenomena, unexpected properties, unforeseen patterns. The goals of complexity theory are ambitious. Its advocates hope to ultimately produce a theory of everything, capable of answering questions as diverse as these: What common principles underlie the growth of bacteria colonies and the fluctuations of the economy? What rules govern the behavior of ecological communities and societies of people? What is consciousness? How does the brain produce thoughts? What has caused the various mass extinctions of species? How, for that matter, did life emerge in the first place? While these questions may appear to have nothing in common besides a seeming intractability, they all concern systems composed of large numbers of interacting parts—that is, complex systems. And so it may not be unreasonable to hypothesize, especially in the light of research suggesting common behavior among at least some complex systems, that a single set of a few simple rules lies at the heart of each of them. Nonetheless, all but the most die-hard advocates of complexity theory admit that this hypothesis is, as yet, nothing but pure speculation. No one can yet claim to really understand how any complex system works. It is precisely this daunting state of affairs that draws researchers to the field, as to any frontier of science that offers the tantalizing promise of exhilarating breakthroughs. Born From ChaosComplexity theory picks up where the field of chaos leaves off. The modern study of chaos, whose origins date to the early 1960s, deals with the generation of complex, even seemingly random, behavior by simple systems. The plopping of drops from a leaky faucet may appear to be quite random, for example, but it actually reflects a complex pattern that is a product of a simple system governed by a few simple rules. (The other side of the chaos coin is that sometimes even a tiny alteration of the conditions in which a system exists can over time give rise to radical, largely unpredictable changes in it.) The full realization that simple systems can produce complex results began to take hold in the early 1980s and led to a profound shift in how science was viewed. As important as this realization has been, however, its general applicability has been limited by the fact that in nature simple systems do not have exclusive rights to complex behavior. There are plenty of complex systems that produce complex behavior, as well. Chaos provides another important starting point for complexity. There is some indication that the most interesting complex systems are those whose behavior verges on the chaotic. Computer simulations that attempt to show (in a simplified way) the emergence of life from a "soup" of chemicals on the early Earth, for instance, imply that the conditions for producing life are those where chaos looms. The history of complexity theory, however, long predates the era when chaos became a popular buzzword. Nineteenth-century physicists such as Ludwig Boltzmann and Sadi Carnot in Europe wrestled with the idea of how to describe systems of huge numbers of parts, such as a gas consisting of many, many atoms or molecules, and in the process laid the foundations for the fields of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. Although thermodynamics and statistical mechanics provide powerful tools for understanding large systems, the two disciplines can generally be applied only to systems that are in equilibrium. Such a limitation precludes the study of the behavior that complexity theorists consider most interesting, because a system in equilibrium remains that way—it does not spontaneously produce unusual behavior. Early contributions to complexity theory were made at the turn of the 20th century by the French mathematician Henri Poincaré, whose work in, for example, celestial mechanics and the theory of orbits led him to point out the possibility of unpredictable behavior in many systems of strongly interacting parts. In mid-century the mathematicians Claude E. Shannon and Gregory J. Chaitin of the United States and Andrei N. Kolmogorov of the Soviet Union made advances in understanding randomness and developed methods for measuring a system's complexity. But the real explosion of interest in complexity theory came with the advent of the computer. Computers are ideally suited for simulating complex systems, because they can quickly and easily handle billions of computations and thereby track the behavior of large systems of interactive components. Simulation enables researchers to observe complex systems to a degree impossible even in the case of many systems less intricate than the world of living things. Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2006. © 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. NH now uses Chaos by intent instead of by accident. Chaos theory explains why, many health problems are fixed, that we did not even know the patient had. Now with the power of chaos, we can only combine 3-5 vials at any one time or you can overload the patient. Here is a small sample of what can be fixed with just one Correction
|
